Does boredom cultivate inspiration?

Bored-people-007

People often ask what inspires my stories, and the answer is many things; sometimes personal experience, sometimes people, sometimes places, sometimes news articles and sometimes…boredom.

Boredom can only take place in an absence of distraction and as such it can prove fertile ground for all manner of great ideas. When I was stuck in a particularly tedious traffic jam a few years ago, I came up with the idea for what my wife maintains is the best book I have written to date – a contemporary teenage romance with an unusual religious twist. The story was completely outside my usual genre fiction comfort zone, but nevertheless it came to me almost fully formed, like a download.

However, whilst the start and end were crystal clear, I lacked second act complications and a setting. I lived in the north-east of England at the time, but somehow that didn’t seem an appropriate location. It was only when I moved to the south-west in the summer of 2006 that I suddenly found my new home to be the ideal setting. Furthermore, at that time I also devised the bulk of the second act after being inspired by rediscovering Shakespeare’s The Comedy of Errors.

This novel – tentatively titled Honour – was one of two near misses I have had with the mainstream publishing industry in that it was almost published in 2008. It was a very disappointing and frustrating experience, but it taught me a thing or two, and I have no doubt that Honour will at some stage see the light of day. I might even self-publish it next year.

Sob stories aside, I conclude by reiterating my belief that it is vital for authors to occasionally experience weapons grade boredom. You may suddenly be inspired to write your best work.

Film Review – Iron Man Three

IM3

The great strength of Marvel’s cinematic superhero mega-franchise is the way the studio carefully selects directors that put their own individual stamp on each film whilst remaining true to the ideals of the comics. That isn’t to say we can expect David Lynch’s Hulk anytime soon, but consider a few examples: Kenneth Branagh added Shakespearean gravitas to Thor, Joe Johnson’s passion for the 1940s (previously seen in The Rocketeer) made him the ideal choice for Captain America, and Joss Whedon’s Buffy credentials more than qualified him for the plate spinning exercise that was Avengers Assemble.

With Iron Man Three, writer/director Shane Black proves an offbeat but inspired choice. His trademark Lethal Weapon/Kiss Kiss Bang Bang style is present and correct – the protagonist commenting on events in voiceover, sharp buddy movie banter, and of course a Christmas setting. The good news is the film works really, really well. So well in fact that this is easily the best of the three Iron Man pictures.

Following events in Avengers Assemble, Tony Stark aka Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr) has post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of his near death experience. Plagued by bad dreams and fear that he cannot protect his beloved Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), he faces a new threat in the form of the mysterious Mandarin (Ben Kingsley) – an adversary he foolishly challenges following an attack on a friend. The result is a devastating reprisal which cuts Tony off from his resources, forcing him to go underground and essentially start from scratch.

This stripped down, back to basics approach to the story is very pleasing, as it brings some genuine jeopardy as well as surprising twists and turns. The whole cast are good, not just the leads but also the support from the likes of Guy Pearce, Don Cheadle and Rebecca Hall. Special effects are, needless to say, spectacular, and there are plenty of exciting action set pieces (the highlights being an aerial attack on Tony’s home and another airborne sequence involving Air Force One). To be fair, it does go on a bit. Certain elements of the finale feel more like The Terminator, and there is also a confusing subplot involving the Vice President that appears to have mostly ended on the cutting room floor.

On the moral menu we have a main course of overcoming pride and fear, with an appetiser of past foolish mistakes coming home to roost, a dessert of the dangers of playing God, and a coffee/after dinner mint of accepting who you are. Nothing particularly new or profound, but all good stuff and always worth reiterating.

Iron Man Three isn’t groundbreaking, but it is very solid entertainment. My eight-year-old reckoned it was on a par with Avengers Assemble but I didn’t think it was quite that good. Look out for the usual Stan Lee cameo and hilarious post-credits scene.

Film Review – The Place Beyond the Pines

PBP

The Place Beyond the Pines is director Derek Cianfrance’s hugely ambitious follow-up to Blue Valentine. It’s a compelling if bleak tale of fathers, sons and generational curses, featuring some strong performances and bravura direction.

The plot begins in the what is probably the early nineties, centring on broke, ne’er do well motorcyclist Luke (Ryan Gosling). Discovering he had a son by waitress Romina (Eva Mendes), a woman he had a fling with, Luke decides to try and make amends – to be a present father to the child, unlike his own father. However, Romina is conflicted as she is with another man. In a misguided attempt to compete, Luke turns to bank robbery as a means of providing for his son.

From there decisions and their consequences span generations, and the story begins to feel like a contemporary Greek tragedy as sins of fathers are revisited upon their children. The theme of fatherlessness – either absent fathers, or present fathers alienated from their offspring as a result of misguided priorities – is hugely relevant, and will certainly touch a few raw nerves. The Place Beyond the Pines is an emotionally resonant parable highlighting a serious spiritual problem, though it offers no solution.

Some have criticised the screenplay for being too neat; for containing too many fateful co-incidences akin to a Dickens novel. But that didn’t bother me personally. Whatever faults the film might have, it is well worth watching for the very strong performances – not just from Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper but also the supporting cast, which as well as Eva Mendes includes Ray Liotta and Rose Byrne. It’s worth giving Dane DeHaan a special mention – an excellent up and coming actor who looks like a young Leonardo Di Caprio. So far he’s best known for his role in Chronicle, but he’s soon to star as Harry Osborn in the next Spider-man film, which should bring him to wider attention.

Cianfrance stamps his own unique directorial style on the film, often using long takes or hand-held camera to give a sense of gritty immediacy. It is also worth adding the usual warning about swearing and some strong violence, but none of it seemed out of context.

Powerful, gripping and moving, The Place Beyond the Pines is a film that lingers in the mind and gets under the skin.

TV Review – Broadchurch

broadchurch

Broadchurch, the eight part series recently seen on ITV in the UK, is an absolutely brilliant, brilliant television drama. If you haven’t seen it please stop reading now, as this article contains MAJOR SPOILERS. Instead, track the series down on catch-up, online, or wherever else it is available (soon on DVD no doubt). For those outside the UK, do try and track it down before the inevitable US remake.

For those who have seen and enjoyed it, here are my thoughts on exactly why it was so fantastic.

Premise:

It wasn’t the murder investigation that was the most compelling factor, but the underlying premise: the examination of a small community torn apart by the tragic killing of eleven year old Danny Latimer. In this respect it shares DNA with Denmark’s The Killing, but it is also different in a number of key ways, enough so it is unique in its own right.

Location:

The Dorset locations used were vivid, dramatic and at times menacing. Anyone who lives in the South West (as I do) knows the understated beauty of that part of Britain, but rarely have locations been used to such, dare I say it, cinematic effect in a television programme.

Characters:

Chris Chibnall’s story was character led, and as such motivations were revealed gradually and organically. Yes, that meant you had to be patient, but the pay-off in this slow-burning drama was worth the wait. Characters were well drawn and for the most part cliché was studiously avoided. Performances were all superb, especially from Olivia Colman as the police detective Ellie Miller. Anyone who has seen her in Tyrannosaur knows how brilliant she is already, but here she excels herself. David Tennant is also admirably restrained as Alec Hardy, her partner in the investigation.

Guessing games:

Although a serious drama, Broadchurch wasn’t so wrapped up in its own importance that it overlooked genre staples, and it even had some nice touches of humour. Here there are multiple suspects, red herrings, theories and counter theories to really keep the audience on their toes as to the identity of the killer. I have to say, When Pauline Quirke’s character was challenged by Miller (“How could you not know what was going on in your own home?”) I immediately knew those words were going to come back to haunt her. But even if the big revelation (a brilliant moment by the way) doesn’t take you by surprise, it hardly matters given the sheer heart-wrenching drama that follows.

Relevance:

Broadchurch achieved what many contemporary dramas miss – a sense of profound relevancy to the times we live in. There’s the subplot involving poor old newspaper seller Jack, who is falsely accused of Danny’s murder, branded a paedophile, and ultimately driven to suicide. This subplot was a devastating condemnation of mob mentality and the damage done by malicious gossip and unproven allegations (in which the press are complicit).

Yet whilst Broadchurch shows the very worst of what humanity is capable of, it dares to end on a note of hope. In spite of the revelation that Danny was accidentally killed by Ellie’s suppressed paedophile husband Joe in a fit of anger (and the fact that he may well have been grooming Danny), the story dares to suggest forgiveness as the way forward. The fault lines opened by the death of Danny Latimer may yet be healed.

It is here that Paul Coates the town vicar (brilliantly played by Arthur Darvill) comes to the fore, providing a superb representation of a Christian. Coates is a tremendous character because he is neither piously and unbelievably perfect, nor the usual hypocrite or worse. Instead he is human – a recovering alcoholic who makes himself available for those who are grieving and need advice. And his advice is actually very good indeed (for example, when he encourages Beth to keep her baby). Furthermore, following the suicide of Jack, he delivers a blistering sermon to the entire town, rebuking them for rushing to judgement and their lack of compassion. Later he delivers a serious dressing down to Hardy for his arrogance and lack of respect towards people of faith. Coates’ greatest moment comes in the deeply, deeply moving finale, as he voices the understated, non-preachy yet crystal clear moral of the story: the only way forward is forgiveness, and to truly love our neighbour.

Broadchurch was challenging, stunningly powerful, emotionally resonant, spiritually true, and very, very satisfying.

My Favourite Science Fiction Novel: Dune

Dune

Frank Herbert’s classic and hugely influential Dune spawned several increasingly inferior sequels, not to mention imitations in print, film and television, and a couple of massively disappointing adaptations (David Lynch’s 1984 movie, and the later miniseries). However, for me, the original book remains my all-time-favourite science fiction novel.

For the uninitiated – in the year 10,191, the most valuable substance in the Universe is the Spice Melange, found exclusively on the desert planet Arrakis. This Spice is essential to space travel. Consequently, competing Imperial Houses battle for control of Arrakis. On one side are the seemingly noble House Atreides, and the reprehensible House Harkonnen are on the other. Both have, to a greater or lesser extent, repressed or exploited the tribal peoples of Arrakis, known as the Fremen.

When the Machiavellian Emperor feels threatened by the popularity of Duke Leto Atreides, he orders House Atreides to occupy Arrakis and mine the Spice, whilst conspiring to assist House Harkonnen to launch a sneak attack on them. Against this background of political skullduggery, Duke Leto’s son Paul arrives on Arrakis and discovers his arrival has been foretold. He may (or may not) be a genetic engineered messianic superbeing destined to free the Fremen from their oppression.

Dune is a truly magnificent, epic read. What makes it work so well is the sheer level of detail in Herbert’s world, with every planet, character, culture and custom meticulously thought through. The story is dramatic and exciting, and contains a number of fascinating potential allegories, particularly considering it was written during the Cold War. For instance, one might suggest House Atreides represent the US and House Harkonnen the USSR, but although they are broadly presented as goodies and baddies respectively in the opening stretches of the novel, this changes considerably as Paul’s journey unfolds, and things get a lot more complex.

The Fremen could be taken as an allegory of Middle Eastern Arab tribes, and obviously the Spice is oil. Paul becomes the Fremen messiah, leading then in a “jihad” against the Emperor. However, this is no simple “Chosen One” type story, as it transpires the only reason the Fremen have these prophecies in their history is because the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood implanted them centuries earlier, knowing they were manipulating political bloodlines to create this genetic superbeing. Their long term goal was to use this individual to take control of Spice on Arrakis for their own ends. However, their schemes backfire when Paul decides he will not be their puppet. Instead, he genuinely liberates the Fremen – even though he foresees this will lead to catastrophe in the long term, with a bloodthirsty interplanetary crusade that will kill millions. The irony is wonderful (and something completely lost in both screen adaptations).

In addition, the Spacing Guild (perhaps symbolising world banks) are determined to keep the Spice flowing, so they collude with the Emperor in his scheme to destroy Leto Atreides. They are aware of the Bene Gesserit scheme so also want Paul killed.

As you can see, the plot takes some unravelling. But it’s well worth it. There are great action sequences, often involving the giant sandworms that dwell on Arrakis, as well as full-blooded political and religious drama, and even a touch of romance. There are also some surprisingly heart-rending moments of tragedy along the way.

As science fiction, this is refreshingly different as it eschews aliens and robots. The former are absent entirely (unless you count mutant Guildsmen or the giant sandworms) and the latter are referred to only in passing reference to history. In the Dune universe, humans once relied too much on technology and were eventually oppressed by their machine creations. Humanity then rose up against the machines then renounced robotics, computers and the like, regressing to Feudalism and relying only on the most basic and essential technology (such as space travel between planets). The new powers to emerge from the revolution against the machines were the Spacing Guild and the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood.

If I had to pick nits, I’d say the occasional Americanism irritates me (for some reason fantasy world characters need to speak Queen’s English) but such moments are very few. If you haven’t read Dune, I hope this has whetted your appetite. Give it a go, but I recommend ignoring all the subsequent books (although immediate sequels Dune Messiah and Children of Dune aren’t bad). Incidentally the title is another name given to the planet Arrakis.

Film Review – Dans la Maison (In the House)

inthehouse

In the House, the new film from director Francois Ozon, makes an interesting and creepy companion piece to  his earlier Swimming Pool. As a psychological drama, this mines similar territory, and works well enough on its own terms – doing just enough, albeit in very low gear, to keep audiences gripped throughout.

The plot concerns frustrated literature teacher Germain (Fabrice Luchini), who finds a spark of potential brilliance amid his mediocre students in Claude (Ernst Umhauer). Germain encourages Claude to develop his literary talents, but in doing so also encourages his obsession with the family of fellow student Rapha (Bastien Ughetto). Aware Claude is particularly drawn to Rapha’s mother (Emmanuelle Seigner), Germain’s art dealer wife Jeanne (Kristin Scott Thomas) warns Germain that Claude could be dangerous. But of course he doesn’t listen and events take increasingly dark turns.

Thematically this shares Swimming Pool’s examination of the writing process, muses, obsession, revenge and what is and isn’t acceptable practice in the pursuit of art. However, it’s a little bit too smart for its own good, especially when fantasy and reality begin to blur. It certainly has a darn sight more substance than Trance (which also vaguely examines whether any piece of art is worth a human life), but it’s obviously a very different film.

To summarise, in spite of fine direction and performances, In the House is not as good as Swimming Pool. It doesn’t build the same head of dramatic steam, nor does it have quite the same level of menace. But it is worth a look nonetheless, especially if you are interesting in writing. If nothing else, it serves as a grim warning about the dangers of encouraging potentially sociopathic literary genius.

Rewriting

rewrite

I once read that unless you are a writer who writes “for yourself”, you will rewrite your work. To say this is true is an understatement.

To date I have written thirteen novels, I have almost finished a fourteenth, and they have all been (or all will be) rewritten to within an inch of their lives. Changes can include plot and character tweaks, adding or cutting words, removal of redundancies, revising poor sentence structure, bad grammar, misspellings and even on occasion the excision of accidentally offensive material. In one novel I wrote, there was a made-up word that someone kindly pointed out to me was in fact not made up, but a very offensive term to a certain major religion. Needless to say, I invented another word!

It is very gratifying when people read and like my work, especially if they enjoy a particular plot point, theme or character detail that only emerged after several rewrites. All the hard work suddenly becomes worthwhile.

On the other hand, there have been times when I’ve been guilty of “overwriting”, because I’m too close to the material. Too much revision and tinkering can be disastrous. I end up losing my nerve and cutting sections that were really good. One novel suffered particularly in this respect, and this year I am planning on restoring it to its earlier glory. That said, no doubt along the way I’ll find other things that bother me about it that need rewriting.

Despite all this, once a book is in print, it really is too late to change it. And that is why I rewrite. And rewrite. And rewrite…