Recent Reviews: First Love and Spectre of Springwell Forest

I’ve had one or two very encouraging reviews on Amazon for my recent work. Firstly, there was this review for Papercut, my short story included in Dragon Soul Press’s romantic fantasy anthology First Love.

First-Love-Kindle“I had a fantastic time reading the anthology. My absolute favourite stories were A Season’s Time, Papercut, and The Rusalka of the Murashka. Mayhap I’m biased because I like stories with a folk and fairy tale twist, or it maybe that I love stories set in nature, or perhaps I simply loved the strong and surprisingly well fleshed out female characters in each story, and wanted them to get everything they wanted. But either way, my reading time was well spent with Shargorod’s little river, Chimney’s dreamscape and a nyad’s forest.”

Secondly, this lengthy rave review of Spectre of Springwell Forest proved particularly satisfying. It essentially told me I achieved everything I set out to achieve with this novel. Here is a slightly edited version:

SSF cover“A darkly intense and intriguing horror story full of mystery, Spectre of Springwell Forest… will have you on the edge of your seat all the way to the end. You won’t dare want to put this book down, as it will haunt you with the darkness that threatens a family, and that threatens to tear them apart in every way… Dark, intense, engaging, and truly gripping from beginning to end…

If you are a lover of horror novels, the supernatural, and don’t mind twisted endings then I think that this book will be a good fit for you. The damage that the family in this story suffers is truly believable. You would honestly think that this story could have happened to someone from the way that it is written so true to life. There are moments of where I normally would have been angry at characters for what they did, but this story felt so real and I loved it!

I am rating this book 5 out of 5 stars. There is nothing that I didn’t like about this story. It is twisted, creepy, dark, and mysterious and kept me engaged. The more I read the deeper I was pulled into the story. I loved the moments of where my jaw literally dropped in shock. I have to admit that I am one who enjoys books from time to time that gives you that less than happy ending, and this book does exactly that. A curse has been laid… and nothing will stop it. Enter Springwell Forest if you dare, but be prepared for the consequences.”

If you read and enjoy any of my stories, please leave a review on Amazon or Goodreads (or ideally both). Reviews on Amazon in particular really help. This isn’t because I require constant affirmation, but because reviews mean their algorithms show my work to more readers. As such, reviews are essential to the livelihood of small time or independent authors like yours truly. They don’t need to be essays. A simple “I liked it” is fine.

Thank you.

Film Review – Avengers Endgame

https _blogs-images.forbes.com_scottmendelson_files_2019_04_screencapture-file-C-Users-JckNa-OneDrive-Desktop-b-avengersendgame-horizontal-friday-17793-04d92fbf-webp-2019-04-23-08_14_14

The Marvel cinematic universe is to this generation what the heyday of Lucas and Spielberg was to my generation. Consequently, Avengers Endgame is an event cinema milestone, and a hugely satisfying culmination of eleven years of blockbuster superhero filmmaking based on the late, great Stan Lee’s most brilliant Marvel comic creations. For eleven years, we’ve had a consistently exciting, entertaining, and playful series of fantastical adventures, some of which have been genuinely outstanding entries in the genre. Avengers Endgame might not be quite at the top of the pile, but it is certainly near the top, and it will more than satisfy fans and more casual viewers. However, I should chuck in a warning that unlike some of the other Marvel films, you really can’t come to this one cold. Prior knowledge is essential.

To avoid spoilers, I won’t say anything about the actual plot, suffice to say it picks up where Infinity War left off, with an admirably downbeat opening act that builds into the Marvel equivalent of an Arthurian quest, and ends with all the huge scale, visual effects packed spectacle that is required and expected. With wit and thrills to spare, this has laughter, tears, and many delightful throwbacks and cameos I won’t mention here.  It is tempting to dismiss some of this as shameless fan service, but why quibble when it works so well?

The returning cast are all terrific. This one focuses in again on the original core Avengers, namely Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr), Steve Rogers/Captain America (Chris Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Bruce Banner/Hulk (Mark Ruffalo), Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow (Scarlet Johansson) and Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner). Everyone gets their moment to shine, but Robert Downey Jr and Chris Evans both take joint first prize as far as I’m concerned. Their characters have come a long way over several films, and here they are each given a really resonant arc that essentially concludes their respective stories.

Directors Anthony and Joe Russo, who have helmed some of the strongest entries in this series, again do sterling work. Needless to say, the visual effects are amazing, but none of the action sequences would mean anything if it weren’t for the solid character groundwork that is meticulously laid in the build up to them. In particular, themes of parenthood, coming to terms with the loss of fathers and mothers, and Christ-like sacrifice are all poignantly explored.

Even though at three hours Avengers Endgame is long, certainly on a first viewing it flies by. It also had far less of the jarring shifts in tone I found problematic in Infinity War. I’m sure it has flaws, but I didn’t really notice them. Perhaps I’ll catch them next time, as I’m definitely going to see it again. You’ll want to as well.

Why I love The Goonies

NC_the_goonies_jef_150604_16x9_992

In late 1985, aged ten, after seeing this TV spot for The Goonies, I really wanted to see it. I voiced my enthusiasm to my mother, not expecting that I would actually be taken. A few days later, my mother informed me that my father wanted to see me that evening, after school. Panicked thoughts rushed through my mind. What had I done now? Had the school complained about me again?

It turned out that my father had decided to take me to see The Goonies at the cinema. Needless to say I was thrilled. I recall the excitement of attending what was then the ABC cinema Magdalen Street Oxford – an old-school art deco one screen auditorium, complete with balcony, and one of those lovely red curtains that rose to reveal the screen. Memories of perusing lobby stills, buying the “storybook”, and then sitting in anticipation of the upcoming film remain as vivid as ever for one chief reason: this was the first time I ever went to the cinema with just me and my father. Every prior cinema trip had included my mother and/or my sister.

Before the main feature, we were treated to the full-length music video for Election Day by Arcadia (Duran Duran in all but name) – a bizarre, pretentious but visually arresting Cocteau influenced bit of 1980s kitsch. We also watched a newsreel update on the money raised by Live Aid, along with a second music video for Mick Jagger and David Bowie’s cover of Dancing in the Street. I call also recall exactly which trailers ran beforehand, including Teen Wolf, Legend, and Back to the Future.

Finally the main feature arrived, which I thoroughly enjoyed. These days I don’t eat cinema snacks, but on that occasion my father had purchased a large packet of Maltesers, chocolates which I have associated with The Goonies ever since. As with everything Steven Spielberg had his name on in those days (even as executive producer), I immediately wanted to see the film again the moment the credits rolled.

Fast forward to 2019, and The Goonies is presently on re-release in UK cinemas. Today, I went to see it again, with my wife and children. We’ve all seen it before, several times, but cinema is in our blood, and we know the big screen is where films really belong. As such, how does The Goonies hold up on a cinema viewing, some thirty-four years later?

sloth_the_gooniesThe painfully honest answer to this question is to acknowledge that The Goonies is not a great film in the same league as the other classics from the heyday of Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. Whilst the likes of Jaws, Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, E.T. The Extra Terrestrial and Back to the Future have all stood the test of time as stone-cold masterpieces, the same cannot objectively be said of The Goonies. At best, it’s a modestly successful children’s treasure hunt adventure, shamelessly pillaged from countless Famous Five or Hardy Boys books, or the Children’s Film Foundation films of the 1970s. Add a pinch of Raiders of the Lost Ark and a dash of Treasure Island and you’ve got a good idea of what to expect.

What is undeniable, is that if you watch the film when you are ten years old, you will love it forever, regardless of an objective assessment of the material. If you watch it for the first time as an adult, you’ll probably find, with a certain generosity of spirit, a reasonably diverting story, with engaging performances from a cast that includes the young Sean Astin and Josh Brolin. Richard Donner directs well, and some of the set pieces are effectively exciting, even though the third act degenerates into pantomime with its trio of incompetent villains.

Viewed for the first time as an adult, you’ll also probably find the children loud and obnoxious – not to mention sweary. This film was made back in the day when children could swear a bit, and you’d still get a PG rating. In fact, it amazes me what you could get away with in a PG film in those days. Parents understood exactly what “Parental Guidance” meant and therefore didn’t expect the BBFC to nanny their children. Hence why today, many films of my childhood (including The Goonies) have 12 certificates instead of PG certificates.

So why do I love The Goonies so much? Well, for one thing the sheer nostalgia. The film reflects childhood days when children played outside, unsupervised, on bikes without safety helmets, and went on (normally imagined) adventures where they hunted for treasure and outwitted foolish villains. There isn’t a mobile phone is sight.

Obviously, that sounds very old-gittish, so here’s a better reason: the subplot between Chunk and Sloth. Of all the Goonies, Chunk is my favourite. Not only do I love his hysterical, very Jewish sense of humour, but I love the deeply humane way he gets to know the “monster” Sloth, leading to the shamelessly sentimental but undeniably touching moment at the end, where he says he’ll take care of him from now on.

MV5BMTU1NzA4MzUxMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDU4NDIwNA@@._V1_But the most important reason I love The Goonies is this: the afore-mentioned treasured memory of seeing the film in the cinema with my late father. Today, in honour of the occasion, I broke my no-snacks cinema habit and purchased some Maltesers. There were other strange echoes of that evening long ago – including a music video for Pink’s Walk Me Home (which played in full beforehand), which reminded me of seeing that Arcadia video.

I will also confess that one small moment in the chaotic finale actually brought a tear to my eye, for obvious reasons. When gadget obsessed Data is reunited with his equally gadget obsessed father, said father tries to take a photo, but his gadgety camera malfunctions. Data just smiles and says “It’s OK Dad. You can’t hug a photo”.

The Goonies might not be a great cinematic work of art, but because it is inexorably tied to memories of my father, for me, it will always be a great film.

The Tangent Tree is back

The Tangent Tree is back! Coming very soon – on Wednesday 24th April to be precise – film podcast The Tangent Tree, which I co-host with the excellent Samantha Stephen, will return for a second series.

44339450_1890651354375252_1073011524940857344_n1

For the uninitiated, The Tangent Tree is so named for the endless tangents in which we indulge whilst discussing all matters film (and occasionally TV or books). For rant-filled banter and general fun, check out our thoughts on disruptive cinema-goers here, our thoughts on scary movies here, why I prefer my romance doomed here, the difference between favourite films versus greatest films here, why I am an unashamed fan of The Last Jedi here, an interview about my novel Spectre of Springwell Forest here… You get the idea.

So what’s coming up in series two? For a start we have a two-parter on science fiction, an episode on film noir (with a lot of discussion about portrayals of the femme fatale character throughout the years), and an episode on political films – which ended up getting rather, well, political (but not in an idiotic polarised Twitter argument way).

Check out the first episode of series two when it “drops” (hopefully not smashing all over the place and making a horrible mess) on Wednesday the 24th of April. Also, catch-up with series one now, either on The Tangent Tree website or on Podcast Addict, iTunes and Spotify.

Film Review – Pet Sematary

uploadscardimage9633927c2e61ce-f376-4b34-bbf2-a485ae28d8ef.jpg950x534__filtersquality90

Stephen King’s bleakest novel Pet Sematary gets a new coat of cinematic paint in this glossy remake from directors Kevin Kolsch and Dennis Widmyer. An undoubted improvement on the disappointing 1989 version, this is reasonably solid stuff for genre fans, although liberties taken with the source text will raise a few hackles amongst purists, and arguably undercut the afore-mentioned bleak tone.

The plot concerns medical doctor Louis (Jason Clarke), his wife Rachel (Amy Seimetz), and their two young children Ellie (Jete Laurence), and Gabe (Hugo Lavoie and Lucas Lavoie). After moving to the country to be more together as a family, Ellie happens upon an eerie pet cemetery in the midst of the woods (the misspelled “Pet Sematary” of the title), where local children bury their deceased pets. Elderly neighbour Jud (John Lithgow) explains how local legends and Native American folklore speak of the “sour” ground having the ability to bring back the dead. When Ellie’s cat is run over, this legend is put to an alarming test – with horrific results.

The trailers spoil too much of the plot, so I won’t – suffice to say this is decently acted and directed, and horror fans should be reasonably satisfied; if hardly overwhelmed or particularly frightened (despite a few obligatory cattle-prod jump scares). Themes of bereavement, guilt, the afterlife, and tampering with spiritual things that shouldn’t be tampered with are woven into the narrative, but not to particularly deep or thought provoking effect. Warnings for gore, violence and bad language are probably superfluous, but here they are nonetheless.

In short, this version of Pet Sematary isn’t likely to make it onto any list of the greatest horror films ever made, but it does an efficient if unremarkable job, making it an agreeably gnarly diversion for those with the stomach for it.

Antagonists with the same goal as the Protagonist

raiders-indy-belloq-2

In Raiders of the Lost Ark, there’s a scene where villainous, Nazi collaborating French archaeologist Belloq tells Indiana Jones that “I am a shadowy reflection of you. It would take only a nudge to make you like me. To push you out of the light.”

Both men are equally obsessed with finding the Ark of the Covenant, and that’s what makes Indiana Jones such a fascinating character in that film. He isn’t a hero so much as a grave robber. Twice he abandons Marion in the pursuit of his goal, and ultimately it takes a terrifying, Old Testament style act of God to get him out of that mindset.

Antagonists with the same or similar goals to the protagonist can provide superb fodder for dramatic storytelling. In my own writing, I’ve done this on a number of occasions. For example, in Uncle Flynn, there are criminal treasure hunters on the same trail as Max and his uncle.

59e4d9084385ae2c008b4830However, this technique isn’t limited to treasure hunt adventures. I’ve also deployed it in some of my other works, including the upcoming supernatural mystery The Irresistible Summons. A ghostly tale concerning a haunting in a London office block, this novel gradually reveals how the deepest desire of the protagonist is mirrored in the deepest desire of the antagonist. At the core of the story lies the simple desire shared by all who have experienced bereavement: namely that they long to see their departed loved ones again.

Where the antagonist and protagonist differ are the techniques they use to achieve their goals, and the lengths they are prepared to go to. In The Irresistible Summons, my protagonist, Naomi Levinson, is a television producer who makes documentaries to debunk the supernatural. When she discovers what might be a genuine haunting, tragedy from her past draws her inexorably towards the discovery of a terrifying secret that could redefine life and death as we know it. Upon discovery of this secret, Naomi’s moral compass will be tested in ways she could not possibly have anticipated. In the meantime, the antagonist also has tragedy in his past, but the lengths he is prepared to go to, in order to ease his pain, are deeply alarming to say the least.

I won’t say anymore, for fear of spoilers. You can find out more when The Irresistible Summons is released this summer.

Film Review – Shazam!

maxresdefault

By now we must be reaching saturation point with superhero movies, right? How many more variations on a theme are there left to be discovered? At least one more, it would appear, since Shazam! – the latest from the not exactly consistent DC Universe – turns out to be smart, funny, exciting, and occasionally touching, with just the right amount of knowing send-up.

Coming off like a superhero take on Big, the plot concerns fourteen-year old Billy Batson (Asher Angel), who after running away from multiple foster homes in search of his lost mother, is sent to live with a couple who were once foster children, that have five other foster children already. One of these children, a superhero nerd cripple with an agreeably dark sense of humour called Freddy (Jack Dylan Grazer), attempts to befriend the new arrival in their home, but at first Billy pushes him away. However, things change when Billy, having been found to be “pure of heart”, finds himself summoned to a mysterious cave and offered the power of an ancient wizarding order. Upon returning to our world he finds he can transform into an adult superhero (played by Zachery Levi) with all manner of powers simply by uttering the word “Shazam”. Cue lots of misadventure and comedy, as Freddy helps Billy come to terms with his new found abilities. Later of course, an inevitable supervillain in the form of demon possessed Dr Thaddeus Sivana (Mark Strong) turns up to test Billy’s mettle.

Performances are winning and the visual effects up to the expected high standard. Director David F Sandberg creates his own beast from the source material, with several laugh-out-loud set pieces, not to mention plenty of wisdom, wit and heart. Also, watch out for one or two clever nods to Big. At times, this also reminded me of underrated found footage superhero film Chronicle.

Themes of fostering, the need for family, and family unity overcoming the power of evil are all woven into the narrative with surprising effectiveness. I actually wouldn’t mind getting a sequel to this one, as there are other places this story could go (especially after the events of the action-packed final reel).

All things considered, Shazam! works a treat and is a joy to watch.

Film Review – Us

us-movie-lupita-e1546071984266

Us completes an astonishing one-two punch of horror gems for writer/director Jordan Peele. If anything, I enjoyed Us even more than Get Out. Some claim it lacks the socio-political bite of the earlier film, but I disagree. On the contrary, the metaphors about America tearing itself apart seem more pertinent than ever.

The film is, first and foremost, a deeply unsettling horror film with an agenda to terrify the viewer. This it builds up to very cleverly; opening with a creepy prologue set in 1986 where a young girl, Adelaide, wanders off at a funfair near a beach. She ends up in a hall of mirrors that borrows from the nightmarish imagery of Belgian surrealist Rene Magritte (specifically the painting Not to be Reproduced, previously referenced in films including Dolores Claiborne and The Double).

The film then flashes forward to the present. Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) is now grown up, with a husband (Winston Duke), teenage daughter (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and young son (Evan Alex). They go on holiday together, staying in a home near the same funfair and beach of the prologue. Flashbacks gradually reveal that something traumatic happened to Adelaide in the hall of mirrors. Various other unsettling incidents then build to a home invasion scenario, culminating in a shocking turn of events that really is best left unspoiled.

Performances are all good (Elizabeth Moss and Tim Heidecker also appear in the supporting cast), but it is Lupita Nyong’o’s superb lead performance that really drives the story – a hugely demanding role that requires an incredible range. As director Peele is in complete control, not above gore and a good jump scare, but also able to conjure an incredible atmosphere of creeping unease. The cinematography and sound design are first-rate, and the music score by Michael Abels cleverly references not only Jerry Goldsmith’s score for The Omen, but also Luniz’s I got 5 on it in a particularly striking sequence. There’s even a stunning twist to top things off, which I really should have seen coming. At this point, I should probably add the usual warnings for violence, gore and bad language.

Us is provocatively titled to wear it’s metaphorical heart on its sleeve, yet strangely, it is also very open to interpretations. In the same way that Don Siegal’s original Invasion of the Body Snatchers can be read as pro or anti McCarthy, so this film is open to a number of different readings. Apart from anything else, it has had lots of people googling Jeremiah Chapter 11 Verse 11 – a Bible passage frequently referenced throughout the film.

Satirical, scary and satisfying, Us will delight genre fans, whilst proving an unsettling, incisive, thought-provoking watch for non-horror fans with the courage to brave it.